<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>I-D Media London Blog &#187; 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.i-dmedialondon.co.uk/tag/20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.i-dmedialondon.co.uk</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:42:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What is a tag?</title>
		<link>http://blog.i-dmedialondon.co.uk/2008/08/what-is-a-tag/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.i-dmedialondon.co.uk/2008/08/what-is-a-tag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bookmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tags]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.i-dmedialondon.co.uk/blog/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new delicious.com thinks it&#8217;s a&#8230; well luggage tag! Although the origin of the term tag hasn&#8217;t really taken too much of my thought time in the past, this association with something so &#8216;real&#8217; and indeed dated seems odd. It may just be part of the graphic launguage delicious have engineered to bring the product [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new <a href="http://delicious.com">delicious.com</a> thinks it&#8217;s a&#8230; well luggage tag! Although the origin of the term tag hasn&#8217;t really taken too much of my thought time in the past, this association with something so &#8216;real&#8217; and indeed dated seems odd. It may just be part of the graphic launguage delicious have engineered to bring the product more into the main stream.  <span class="a"></span></p>
<p>http://l.yimg.com/hr/10313/img/searchbartag.gif</p>
<p><a href="http://www.i-dmedialondon.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/tag.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-50" title="tag" src="http://www.i-dmedialondon.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/tag.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="48" /></a></p>
<p>Whilst on the subject of <a href="http://delicious.com">delicious.com</a>, another example of the mainstream movement would be the depreciation of the old URL <span class="a">del.icio.us. This is a real shame in my view. The previous URL was more than simply a domain, it was a brand mark, a nice nod to the technology and the origins of the site. Now it&#8217;s simply another generic domain name, albeit one that more word of mouth friendly, that disappears into the noise.<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.i-dmedialondon.co.uk/2008/08/what-is-a-tag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>STOP PRESS!: Brands Not Winning Friends On Social Nets: Report</title>
		<link>http://blog.i-dmedialondon.co.uk/2008/06/stop-press-brands-not-winning-friends-on-social-nets-report/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.i-dmedialondon.co.uk/2008/06/stop-press-brands-not-winning-friends-on-social-nets-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.i-dmedialondon.co.uk/blog/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to new research from Jupiter Research, half of all branded social networking pages in Europe have less than 1,000 friends.
I came across this on another blog under the title. “Brands Not Winning Friends On Social Nets: Report”
The report goes on to say “Many advertisers build branded social networking pages that broadcast content rather than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to new research from Jupiter Research, half of all branded social networking pages in Europe have less than 1,000 friends.</p>
<p>I came across this on another blog under the title. “Brands Not Winning Friends On Social Nets: Report”</p>
<p>The report goes on to say “Many advertisers build branded social networking pages that broadcast content rather than inviting users to interact.”</p>
<p>And they wonder why they&#8217;re short of social buddies!</p>
<p>This points to a pretty fundamental misunderstanding by brands as to what’s motivating users online. As brands adapt to a new customer and communication landscape there are some lessons to be learnt along the way and this is one of the big ones.</p>
<p>It’s by no way a new idea in branding but still brands are getting it wrong.</p>
<p>Give your customers a reward, excite them, get them to enjoy spending time with you and they will. Customers don’t flock to the loudest shouter anymore, they move towards the one who’s giving the most. So don’t expect a heap of ‘friends’ if your just trailing your new TV ad on Facebook. That’s hardly even 1.1 let alone 2.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.i-dmedialondon.co.uk/2008/06/stop-press-brands-not-winning-friends-on-social-nets-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

